Performance Appraisal: Methods, Process & Objectives
What is Performance Appraisal? (Meaning & Concept)
Performance Appraisal (PA) is the systematic evaluation of an individual with respect to his or her performance on the job and their potential for development.
It is a formal, structured system of measuring and evaluating an employee’s job-related behaviors and outcomes. The goal is to discover how and why the employee is performing the way they are and how they can improve in the future to benefit the employee, the organization, and society.
-
Key Focus: It measures both past performance and future potential.
-
Key Requirement: Successful appraisal requires a consistent approach, clear standards, and bias-free ratings.
Objectives of Performance Appraisal
Why do organizations conduct appraisals? Here are the 5 main objectives:
-
Compensation Decisions: It serves as a basis for pay raises and bonuses. It supports the idea of “pay for performance” rather than just seniority.
-
Promotion Decisions: It acts as a guide for job changes, transfers, or promotions based on competence.
-
Training & Development: It identifies skill gaps. It tells employees what skills they need to develop to move up the ladder.
-
Feedback: It provides constructive feedback to employees about where they stand and how they can improve.
-
Personal Development: It helps reveal the root causes of good or poor performance, aiding in self-improvement.
The Performance Appraisal Process
The appraisal process is a systematic cycle:
1. Objectives of Performance Appraisal
-
The first step is to clearly define why the appraisal is being done.
-
Objectives may include improving employee performance, deciding promotions or salary increments, identifying training needs, and evaluating strengths & weaknesses.
-
Clear objectives make the appraisal system meaningful and useful.
2. Establish Job Expectations
-
Employees must know what is expected from them.
-
HR and managers set performance standards, job responsibilities, and key result areas (KRAs).
-
When expectations are clear, employees can perform better and meet targets.
3. Design an Appraisal Program
-
HR decides the method of appraisal to be used (e.g., ranking method, rating scale, 360-degree feedback, MBO, etc.).
-
The program includes who will evaluate (manager, peers, customers, or self-appraisal), when evaluation will take place, and how the process will be recorded.
-
A good design ensures fairness and transparency.
4. Appraise the Performance
-
Actual evaluation of the employee takes place.
-
Performance is measured by comparing actual performance with standards set earlier.
-
Data is collected through observation, reports, tests, checklists, feedback, etc.
-
The goal is to get a realistic and unbiased assessment.
5. Performance Interview / Feedback
-
The manager discusses results with the employee.
-
Strengths and areas for improvement are communicated.
-
It helps in motivation, understanding problems, and setting future goals.
-
This should be a two-way discussion, not just criticism.
6. Use Appraisal Data for Appropriate Purpose
-
-
The final step is using the appraisal results for HR decisions.
-
Used for:
-
Promotions, transfers, rewards, salary hikes
-
Training and development
-
Career planning
-
Corrective actions (if necessary)
-
-
Ensures that the appraisal process leads to action and improvement.
-

Techniques & Methods of Performance Appraisal
Appraisal methods are broadly classified into Past-Oriented and Future-Oriented methods.
A. Past-Oriented Methods (Traditional)
1. Rating Scales
The most common method. It consists of numerical scales representing job-related criteria (e.g., dependability, output, attitude). The rater marks the employee on a scale from “Poor” to “Excellent.”
-
Pros: Easy to use for large numbers of employees.
-
Cons: Prone to rater bias and the “illusion of precision.”
2. Checklists
A list of statements about employee traits (e.g., “Is regular?”, “Works hard?”). The rater simply ticks ‘YES’ or ‘NO’. HR assigns weights/scores to these answers later.
-
Pros: Economical and standardized.
-
Cons: Biased if weights are improper.
3. Forced Choice Method
The rater must choose from a block of statements (e.g., “Learns fast” vs. “Works hard”) to describe the employee. This reduces personal bias as the rater doesn’t know the scoring value of each statement.
4. Critical Incident Method
The superior records specific “critical” incidents of behavior that led to success or failure (e.g., “Handled a difficult client perfectly” or “Missed a key deadline”). In this manager records specific good or bad incidents of employee behavior.
-
Pros: Based on actual behavior and events, not vague traits.
-
Cons: Negative incidents are often noticed more than positive ones.
5. Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS)
A modern technique that combines rating scales with critical incidents. It uses descriptive statements of behavior (anchors) to define points on the scale (e.g., a “5” rating is defined by specific, excellent behavior).
-
Pros: Very accurate and job-specific.
-
Cons: Time-consuming to develop.
6. Field Review Method
An outsider (from HR or corporate) conducts the appraisal by interviewing the supervisor. This reduces supervisor bias but is time-consuming.
B. Future-Oriented Methods (Modern)
1. Management by Objectives (MBO)
Proposed by Peter F. Drucker (1954).
-
Process: The superior and subordinate jointly set specific goals for a time period. At the end, performance is measured against these agreed goals or achievement of the goals.
-
Pros: Increases motivation and clarity.
-
Cons: Not suitable for rigid jobs (like assembly lines).
2. 360-Degree Feedback
A multi-source appraisal where data is collected from everyone around the employee: Supervisors, Peers, Subordinates, Customers, and Self evalution.
-
Pros: Provides a holistic view; excellent for soft skills and leadership development.
-
Cons: Can be intimidating; analysis is complex.
3. Assessment Centers
Employees are evaluated by a team of experts using various exercises like role-playing, case studies, and business games over 2-3 days. Ideally used for identifying potential managers.
- Judges managerial and leadership skills.
4. Psychological Appraisal
Conducted by psychologists using in-depth interviews and tests to assess personality, intellectual, emotional, and motivational characteristics. It focuses on future potential.
Problems & Errors in Appraisal
Even the best systems fail if raters are biased. Common errors include:
-
Halo Effect: Rating an employee high on everything just because they are good at one thing (e.g., Communication).
-
Horn Effect: Rating an employee low on everything because of one negative trait.
-
Central Tendency: Playing it safe by rating everyone as “Average.”
-
Leniency/Strictness: Being too nice or too harsh to everyone.
-
Recency Effect: Judging based only on the last few weeks rather than the whole year.
-
Stereotyping: Judging based on gender, race, or background rather than performance.
Performance Management System (PMS)
Performance Management is broader than just “Appraisal.” It is a continuous process of:
-
Identifying performance parameters.
-
Setting standards.
-
Planning performance in participation with employees.
-
Identifying competency gaps.
-
Planning development activities.
- And improve employee performance.
While Appraisal is a one-time event (evaluation), Management is an ongoing cycle of goal-setting, monitoring, and feedback to ensure organizational goals are met.










